Abstract

A two-stage flexible flow shop scheduling is a manufacturing infrastructure designed to process a set of jobs, in which a single machine is available at the first stage and m parallel machines are available at the second stage. At the second stage, each task can be processed by multiple parallel machines. The objective is to minimize the maximum job completion time, i.e., the makespan. Sun et al. (J Softw 25:298–313, 2014) presented an $$O(n\log n)$$ -time 3-approximation algorithm for $$F2(1, Pm)~|~size_i~|~C_{\max }$$ under some special conditions. Zhang et al. (J Comb Optim 39:1–14, 2020) presented a 2.5-approximation algorithm for $$F2(1, P2)~|~line_i~|~C_{\max }$$ and a 2.67-approximation algorithm for $$F2(1, P3)~|~line_i~|~C_{\max }$$ , which both run in linear time. In this paper, we achieved following improved results: for $$F2(1, P2)~|~line_i~|~C_{\max }$$ , we present an $$O(n\log n)$$ -time 2.25-approximation algorithm, for $$F2(1, P3)~|~line_i~|~C_{\max }$$ , we present an $$O(n\log n)$$ -time 7/3-approximation algorithm, for $$F2(1, Pm)~|~size_i~|~C_{\max }$$ with the assumption $$ \mathop {\min }_{1 \le i \le n} \left\{ {{p_{1i}}} \right\} \ge \mathop {\max }_{1 \le i \le n} \left\{ {{p_{2i}}} \right\} $$ , we present a linear time optimal algorithm.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.