Abstract
My comments concern the serious errors in the crystallographic part of the commented paper. Authors have proposed that their sample presents a new crystal with the supposed chemical formula Ba3Bi2WO9. However, the correct analysis shows that the studied sample is a mixture of at least two compounds, Ba3W2O9 and Ba3WO6. As a result, the subsequent data on physical properties of the sample may be without a scientific value.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call