Abstract

Imperialist plan or post-imperialist reflex? Reassessing Russia's Transnistria policy Russia's policy in the Transnistrian conflict is often portrayed as an example of Mos- cow's imperialist agenda; as proactive and manipulative; and as secondary to Russia's global, great power ambitions. This article re-assesses Russia's Transnistria policy from the fall of the Soviet Union until the end of 2010. It finds that Russian policy is better understood as post-imperialist than imperialist; that it has been largely reactive, responding to developments beyond Moscow's control; and that the regional security situation, rather than global great power ambitions, has been the most immediate cause for change in policy. In light of these re-assessments, in conclusion the article briefly considers the place of Russia's Transnistria policy in Moscow's policy towards the post-Soviet space in general, as well as the importance of these findings for a possi- ble solution to the Transnistrian conflict.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.