Abstract

We study the impact of an accurate computation and incorporation of coloured noise in radar altimeter data when computing a regional quasi-geoid model using least-squares techniques. Our test area comprises the Southern North Sea including the Netherlands, Belgium, and parts of France, Germany, and the UK. We perform the study by modelling the disturbing potential with spherical radial base functions. To that end, we use the traditional remove-compute-restore procedure with a recent GRACE/GOCE static gravity field model. Apart from radar altimeter data, we use terrestrial, airborne, and shipboard gravity data. Radar altimeter sea surface heights are corrected for the instantaneous dynamic topography and used in the form of along-track quasi-geoid height differences. Noise in these data are estimated using repeat-track and post-fit residual analysis techniques and then modelled as an auto regressive moving average process. Quasi-geoid models are computed with and without taking the modelled coloured noise into account. The difference between them is used as a measure of the impact of coloured noise in radar altimeter along-track quasi-geoid height differences on the estimated quasi-geoid model. The impact strongly depends on the availability of shipboard gravity data. If no such data are available, the impact may attain values exceeding 10 centimetres in particular areas. In case shipboard gravity data are used, the impact is reduced, though it still attains values of several centimetres. We use geometric quasi-geoid heights from GPS/levelling data at height markers as control data to analyse the quality of the quasi-geoid models. The quasi-geoid model computed using a model of the coloured noise in radar altimeter along-track quasi-geoid height differences shows in some areas a significant improvement over a model that assumes white noise in these data. However, the interpretation in other areas remains a challenge due to the limited quality of the control data.

Highlights

  • Radar altimeter data in the form of along-track geoid slopes or along-track geoid height differences play an important role in regional geoid modelling (Hwang et al 1997; Hwang and Hsub 2008; Sandwell and Smith 2005, 2009; Smith 2010; Slobbe 2013; Slobbe and Klees 2014; Slobbe et al 2014)

  • Though there are numerous approaches of how differential radar altimeter measurements are used in quasi-geoid modelling, a common nominator is that noise in along-track geoid slopes or geoid height differences is assumed to be white, sometimes after a lowpass filtering has been applied

  • The main research question to be addressed in this manuscript is about the impact of accounting for coloured noise in radar altimeter along-track quasi-geoid height differences on a regional quasi-geoid model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radar altimeter data in the form of along-track (quasi-) geoid slopes (i.e., deflections of the vertical) or along-track (quasi-) geoid height differences play an important role in regional (quasi-) geoid modelling (Hwang et al 1997; Hwang and Hsub 2008; Sandwell and Smith 2005, 2009; Smith 2010; Slobbe 2013; Slobbe and Klees 2014; Slobbe et al 2014). The main research question to be addressed in this manuscript is about the impact of accounting for coloured noise in radar altimeter along-track quasi-geoid height differences on a regional quasi-geoid model. We make an attempt to answer the question whether or not the quality of a quasi-geoid model improves when coloured noise in radar altimeter along-track quasi-geoid height differences is accounted for This test is performed for two control data sets, namely, (1) the European Gravimetric Geoid 2015, EGG2015 (Denker 2013, 2015) assuming that no shipboard gravity data are available when computing the quasi-geoid, and (2) GPS/levelling data at height markers for the Dutch and Belgium mainlands.

Regional quasi-geoid modelling
Data and data pre-processing
Parameterization
Data weighting
Noise estimation and modelling
Impact of accounting for coloured noise
Excluding shipboard gravity data
Including shipboard gravity data
Using a single ARMA model
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call