Abstract

A network analysis including relative abundances of all ruminal microbial genera (archaea, bacteria, fungi, and protists) and their genes was performed to improve our understanding of how the interactions within the ruminal microbiome affects methane emissions (CH4). Metagenomics and CH4 data were available from 63 bovines of a two-breed rotational cross, offered two basal diets. Co-abundance network analysis revealed 10 clusters of functional niches. The most abundant hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriales with key microbial genes involved in methanogenesis occupied a different functional niche (i.e., “methanogenesis” cluster) than methylotrophic Methanomassiliicoccales (Candidatus Methanomethylophylus) and acetogens (Blautia). Fungi and protists clustered together and other plant fiber degraders like Fibrobacter occupied a seperate cluster. A Partial Least Squares analysis approach to predict CH4 variation in each cluster showed the methanogenesis cluster had the best prediction ability (57.3%). However, the most important explanatory variables in this cluster were genes involved in complex carbohydrate degradation, metabolism of sugars and amino acids and Candidatus Azobacteroides carrying nitrogen fixation genes, but not methanogenic archaea and their genes. The cluster containing Fibrobacter, isolated from other microorganisms, was positively associated with CH4 and explained 49.8% of its variability, showing fermentative advantages compared to other bacteria and fungi in providing substrates (e.g., formate) for methanogenesis. In other clusters, genes with enhancing effect on CH4 were related to lactate and butyrate (Butyrivibrio and Pseudobutyrivibrio) production and simple amino acids metabolism. In comparison, ruminal genes negatively related to CH4 were involved in carbohydrate degradation via lactate and succinate and synthesis of more complex amino acids by γ-Proteobacteria. When analyzing low- and high-methane emitters data in separate networks, competition between methanogens in the methanogenesis cluster was uncovered by a broader diversity of methanogens involved in the three methanogenesis pathways and larger interactions within and between communities in low compared to high emitters. Generally, our results suggest that differences in CH4 are mainly explained by other microbial communities and their activities rather than being only methanogens-driven. Our study provides insight into the interactions of the rumen microbial communities and their genes by uncovering functional niches affecting CH4, which will benefit the development of efficient CH4 mitigation strategies.

Highlights

  • By 2050, the human population will grow to over 9 billion people, and in the same time frame, global meat consumption is projected to increase by 73% (FAO, 2011)

  • The distribution of CH4 emissions from 63 beef cattle overall and for groups of high and low CH4 emitters (HME and LME), forage and concentrate diets (FOR and CONC) and crossbred Aberdeen Angus (AA) and Limousin (LIM) steers are illustrated in Supplementary Figures S1A,B, respectively

  • The novelty of this study lies in the capacity to unprecedently identify 10 microbial functional niches associated with different functions in the rumen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

By 2050, the human population will grow to over 9 billion people, and in the same time frame, global meat consumption is projected to increase by 73% (FAO, 2011). Microbial fermentation is conducted by complex and diverse microbial populations composed of bacteria, protozoa and fungi potentially sharing similar genes and functions, interacting together, adapting to different environments (e.g., diet change) and playing a central role in the ability of ruminants to utilize fibrous substrates. Bacterial populations interacting with methanogens that utilize H2 or involved in different metabolic pathways associated with amino acids, lactate or volatile fatty acids (VFA) are known to have different effects on CH4 emissions (Moss et al, 2000; Janssen, 2010; Wanapat et al, 2015; Kamke et al, 2016; Sa et al, 2016). Several authors revealed the importance of interactions between bacteria, fungi, protists (protozoa and micro-algae) and archaea in their effects on CH4 emissions (Kumar et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2017; Huws et al, 2018)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call