Abstract

The optimal dispatch of hydropower plants consists of the challenge of taking advantage of both available head and river flows. Despite the objective of delivering the maximum power to the grid, some variables are uncertain, dynamic, non-linear, and non-parametric. Nevertheless, some models may help hydropower generating players with computer science evolution, thus maximizing the hydropower plants’ power production. Over the years, several studies have explored Machine Learning (ML) techniques to optimize hydropower plants’ dispatch, being applied in the pre-operation, real-time and post-operation phases. Hence, this work consists of a systematic review to analyze how ML models are being used to optimize energy production from hydropower plants. The analysis focused on criteria that interfere with energy generation forecasts, operating policies, and performance evaluation. Our discussions aimed at ML techniques, schedule forecasts, river systems, and ML applications for hydropower optimization. The results showed that ML techniques have been more applied for river flow forecast and reservoir operation optimization. The long-term scheduling horizon is the most common application in the analyzed studies. Therefore, supervised learning was more applied as ML technique segment. Despite being a widely explored theme, new areas present opportunities for disruptive research, such as real-time schedule forecast, run-of-river system optimization and low-head hydropower plant operation.

Highlights

  • Hydropower generation has a 75% share of renewable sources in the world electrical mix [1]

  • We built research questions to find the most significant number of published studies and data that could bring answers related to Machine Learning (ML) techniques applied for hydropower optimization

  • Regarding the non-numeric criteria: for QC1, we considered if the ML technique was applied soundly with no glaring misconception and if the article was sufficiently sound as well

Read more

Summary

A Systematic Review

Jose Bernardes, Jr. 1 , Mateus Santos 2 , Thiago Abreu 1 , Lenio Prado, Jr. 1,3 , Dannilo Miranda 2 , Ricardo Julio 2 , Pedro Viana 4 , Marcelo Fonseca 4 , Edson Bortoni 1 and Guilherme Sousa Bastos 2, *.

Introduction
Research Methodology
Research Questions
Data Sources and Search Strategies
Review Conduction
Search String
Study Selection
Document Selection
Data Synthesis
Result
Discussions
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call