Abstract
This article analyses how authoritarian governments respond to freshwater scarcity. It explores the link between mega-hydroengineering works and authoritarian governance structures, introducing the concept of hydro-authoritarianism based on four recurring patterns: centralisation of decision-making and securitisation of freshwater governance; institutional bias towards mega-engineering projects; repression of critical environmental and academic voices; and largely unconstrained (mostly domestic) finance. We conclude that the near-exclusive focus on transferring water across vast distances limits attention to the demand-driven causes of water stress. Although the article focuses on central Eurasia and China, patterns of hydro-authoritarianism have appeared wherever checks on power are undermined or absent.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call