Abstract

A circular economy aims at decoupling value creation from resource throughput. For circular economy to contribute to environmental and resource improvements, there is need for critical assessments regarding in what general situations, beyond individual cases, solutions may lead to improvements. On the product-level, there is need for synthesized knowledge accounting for a wide range of contexts and environmental impacts. We investigate what resource efficiency (RE) measures result in reduced physical flows and environmental impacts, depending on the characteristics of products and their life cycles. The study is limited to physical measures on a product system level, irrespective of manner of implementation. A library of comparative assessments (primarily life cycle assessments and material flow analyses) was built, covering a wide range of products and RE measures. A framework was formulated for analysing for which product characteristics a measure tends to improve RE, and under which contexts there are trade-offs to take into account. For example, sharing of products is best suited for durable and infrequently used products that tend not to reach their full technical lifetime. A trade-off is that sharing can increase transportation for accessing shared stock. The identified key product characteristics were: whether products are consumable or durable, active or passive, typically used for their full technical lifetimes or discarded before being worn out, the product’s frequency of use and whether function remains at a product’s end of use. Pace of development matters for suitability of measures for active, durable products, while complexity is relevant for restorative measures and recycling.

Highlights

  • Introduction and aimCircular economy (CE) is the most recent response to growing concerns over resource use and associated waste

  • This paper has shown what resource efficiency (RE) measures are suitable for products with what characteristics

  • The use of a life cycle perspective allowed the identification of potential trade-offs associated with each RE measure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Introduction and aimCircular economy (CE) is the most recent response to growing concerns over resource use and associated waste. Measures can be interdependent, as recognised by Blomsma and Brennan (2017), who introduce the concept of circular configurations for several different measures working together in sequence or parallel. They call for assessments, using e.g. life cycle assessment (LCA) or material flow analysis (MFA), to systematically investigate circular configurations in different and realworld contexts. This can enable learning about the configurations and their interdependencies, and aids in assessing in what contexts measures are effective

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call