Abstract

.The differential diagnosis for lymphadenopathy is wide and clinical presentations overlap, making obtaining an accurate diagnosis challenging. We sought to characterize the clinical and radiological characteristics, histological findings, and diagnoses for a cohort of patients with lymphadenopathy of unknown etiology. 121 Peruvian adults with lymphadenopathy underwent lymph node biopsy for microbiological and histopathological evaluation. Mean patient age was 41 years (Interquartile Range 26–52), 56% were males, and 39% were HIV positive. Patients reported fever (31%), weight loss (23%), and headache (22%); HIV infection was associated with fever (P < 0.05) and gastrointestinal symptoms (P < 0.05). Abnormalities were reported in 40% of chest X-rays (N = 101). Physicians suspected TB in 92 patients (76%), lymphoma in 19 patients (16%), and other malignancy in seven patients (5.8%). Histological diagnoses (N = 117) included tuberculosis (34%), hyperplasia (27%), lymphoma (13%), and nonlymphoma malignancy (14%). Hyperplasia was more common (P < 0.001) and lymphoma less common (P = 0.005) among HIV-positive than HIV-negative patients. There was a trend toward reduced frequency of caseous necrosis in samples from HIV-positive than HIV-negative TB patients (67 versus 93%, P = 0.055). The spectrum of diagnoses was broad, and clinical and radiological features correlated poorly with diagnosis. On the basis of clinical features, physicians over-diagnosed TB, and under-diagnosed malignancy. Although this may not be inappropriate in resource-limited settings where TB is the most frequent easily treatable cause of lymphadenopathy, diagnostic delays can be detrimental to patients with malignancy. It is important that patients with lymphadenopathy undergo a full diagnostic work-up including sampling for histological evaluation to obtain an accurate diagnosis.

Highlights

  • The differential diagnosis for lymphadenopathy is wide and includes infectious, immunological and metabolic disorders, and primary or secondary neoplasms.[1,2] In the developed world, common infectious causes predominate including upper respiratory tract infections, Epstein–Barr Virus, and cytomegalovirus, whereas in resource-poor settings other infections such as tuberculosis (TB), toxoplasmosis, HIV seroconversion, leishmaniasis, and fungal infections may be important causes.[3]

  • On the basis of clinical features, physicians over-diagnosed TB, and under-diagnosed malignancy. This may not be inappropriate in resource-limited settings where TB is the most frequent treatable cause of lymphadenopathy, diagnostic delays can be detrimental to patients with malignancy

  • There was no significant difference in age, sex, frequency of HIV positivity, or rate of previous TB between patients who were included in and those who were excluded from analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The differential diagnosis for lymphadenopathy is wide and includes infectious, immunological and metabolic disorders, and primary or secondary neoplasms.[1,2] In the developed world, common infectious causes predominate including upper respiratory tract infections, Epstein–Barr Virus, and cytomegalovirus, whereas in resource-poor settings other infections such as tuberculosis (TB), toxoplasmosis, HIV seroconversion, leishmaniasis, and fungal infections may be important causes.[3] Malignant causes such as lymphoma and leukemia are less frequent but correct and prompt diagnosis has prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call