Abstract

In the absence of adequate support from formal social safety nets, rural households in Ethiopia have developed collective risk-sharing strategies to buffer them against adverse livelihood shocks, thus building their resilience capacities. Social capital and network based indigenous mutual support arrangements are the most important strategies that are institutionalized and widely practiced among rural households for centuries in Ethiopia to support households to cope with shocks. Nonetheless, resilience research and rural poverty alleviation policies have yet to fully recognize and embrace social capital as a tool to tackle poverty and vulnerability. Robust policy and academic studies on the role of indigenous welfare system with implications for social development policy making in Ethiopia are lacking. Using ethnographic techniques and simple descriptive statistics, we studied indigenous mutual support systems and how they shape the resilience trajectories of rural households against livelihood shocks within two selected PAs of Babille district of Oromia region. We found that mutual support practices are very effective in building coping resilience of households by smoothing consumption shocks. However, the traditional coping mechanisms often fail when the shock is systemic or covariate, when shocks last longer, and when a household has low level of human or finical capital.

Highlights

  • About two-thirds of the developing World’s 3 billion rural people live in about 475 million small farm households, working on land plots smaller than 2 hectares [1]

  • Though it is too early to make this assertion, our finding suggests that households better located in the wealth ladder seem to have better social capital and ability to secure support compared to other households living within the same village

  • Using the theoretical framework that we provided in the beginning of this paper and additional indicators brought up by respondents during interviews and group discussions, we have generated a list of indicators to evaluate the role of indigenous mutual welfare practices in the process of building the coping, adaptive, and transformative capacities of households in the case study community

Read more

Summary

Introduction

About two-thirds of the developing World’s 3 billion rural people live in about 475 million small farm households, working on land plots smaller than 2 hectares [1]. They have limited access to markets and other social services including insurance and safety net to support their livelihoods. The incidence of poverty in these populations is more prevalent and deep-rooted among rural populations than urban residents [2] Their ability to break and escape from the vicious circle of poverty is often jeopardized by vulnerability to frequent shocks. These shocks include adverse events that trigger a decline in household welfare, such as disease and pest, erratic climate, input price fluctuation, conflict, and policy shocks [3]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call