Abstract
This article aims to think the Cold War (194789) under the conceptual viewpoint, after the happening heideggerian axiom, i.e., framing it as a narrative structure. The phenomena naming act is not unidirectional. The language says what happened and what happened re-says the language. In this sense, language is not only a tool to express concepts and thoughts. It turns itself into political arena. The world's division under a bipolar logic has shaped the political language into a dualistic paradox. Here is intended to relate this paradox during the Cold War's discourse formation with the emergence of other actors whom have relativized and reframed it.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
