Abstract
Ground-motion suite selection for Eastern North America (ENA) is distinguished from suite selection for high seismic regions by uncertainty related to earthquake intensity, spectral shape, and the wide range of relevant periods experienced by low-ductility structures. Whereas trends in high seismic regions point toward developing smaller, more efficient suites for use in practice based on reliable intensity parameters, current research on moderate seismic regions requires the development of ground-motion suites capable of exciting the widest range of structural periods while accounting for uncertainty related to ground-motion intensity. This paper discusses uncertainty related to ENA ground motions in terms of the logic tree in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (epistemic uncertainty) and the deaggregation of hazard into magnitude and distance bins (aleatory uncertainty), recommends a suite selection process for addressing this uncertainty without amplitude scaling, and evaluates the effectiveness of a specific suite in the context of reliability-based performance assessment procedures.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call