Abstract
ABSTRACT Until a decade ago, the idea that Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) had successfully democratized prevailed in political science. In the current context of democratic malaise, it has been argued that this “optimism” arose from the discipline’s privileging of more effusive positivist accounts over more cautious interpretivist accounts. Based on quantitative analysis of 500 papers about CEE published 2000-2015, we find cautious support for these claims. Positivist-leaning research categories predominate in higher-impact general journals, and some also correlate with optimistic conclusions about democratization. Conversely, more cautious findings correlate with interpretive-leaning research categories, these mostly confined to area studies journals.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call