Abstract

Simple SummaryDifferences in the range use by poultry exist on the individual or breed level, even if equal opportunity of outdoor access is provided. Birds reared with access to the pasture consume some of the material found outdoors, such as plants, insects, and stones. The frequency of outdoor range use may be associated with the ingested material and the development of the bird gut. Optimal gastrointestinal tract morphometrics or small intestine microstructure are important for nutrient absorption and essential for poultry to resist diseases and assure welfare. Development of the gastrointestinal tract and its content could furthermore retrospectively indicate the birds’ ranging profile. The aim of the current study was to compare gastrointestinal tract morphometrics, small intestine microstructure, as well as the amount of pasture-originating material and feed ingested by the birds differing in their ranging profile, separately for the slow-growing broiler hybrid Sasso and green-legged partridge, a Polish indigenous breed of chicken. We found that the contents of the crop and gizzard of the moderate-indoor green-legged partridges were different from the indoor- and outdoor-preferring ranging profiles. In Sasso, the development of the villi in terms of their height and area in outdoor-preferring birds was different from that observed in other ranging profiles.Optimal development of the gut is important for nutrient absorption and for poultry to resist diseases. The aim of the study was to compare gastrointestinal tract morphometrics, small intestine microstructure, as well as the amount of pasture matter and feed ingested by the birds with outdoor access presenting either an outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor or indoor-preferring ranging profile. Sixty non-beak trimmed birds per strain: broiler hybrid Sasso and Polish indigenous green-legged partridge were housed from week 5 to 10 in groups of 10, under conditions of EU organic meat chicken production. Pens with outdoor ranges were video recorded, to obtain frequencies of the birds’ range use. Statistical analysis was conducted applying generalized linear mixed models, applying the ranging profile as a fixed effect and pen as a random factor. The weight of the pasture matter in bird crops was the highest in moderate-outdoor profiled green-legged partridges, as compared to other ranging profiles (p = 0.04). In Sasso, villi in the small intestines were significantly higher in the outdoor-preferring compared to indoor-preferring profiled birds (p = 0.04), while their area was larger in the outdoor-preferring Sasso birds (p = 0.01). The level of development of the gastrointestinal tract and its content may be a potential indicator of the birds’ ranging profile and forage consumption.

Highlights

  • Either slow-growing, indigenous or heritage chicken breeds are used for meat production in low-input systems

  • In green-legged partridges, the ranging profile affected pasture matter weight identified in the crop and fraction of the particles of the size between 1000 and 1400 μm identified in the gizzard

  • In Sasso birds, we detected that the development of the villi height and area in outdoor-preferring birds was different from that observed in birds with other ranging profiles and they had the best digestion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Either slow-growing, indigenous or heritage chicken breeds are used for meat production in low-input systems. A slow-growing genotype may be defined as a bird with a daily weight gain below 45 g, attaining 2.2 to 2.5 kg in 56 to 81 days [1]. McCrea et al 2014 [2] defined the indigenous chicken breeds as ones that are derived from traditional lines, have a slow growth rate and can spend most of their life outdoors. Slow-growing or indigenous chicken breeds are often characterized by being more active [3], robust and with excellent livability [1,4], due to a stronger immunological system [5]. Campbell et al 2016 [11] profiled individual laying hens, differing in their ranging profiles, as outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor, and indoor-preferring

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.