From threat to opportunity: Hydrologic uncertainty regionalization across large domains

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Study regionThe study was carried out in Northern Canada (90,000 km2) and Southern Canada (18,000 km2). These basins represent case studies with a larger application target of high latitude regions. Study focusAs model domains become large, ungauged basins are inevitably encountered, and basin heterogeneity increases. This study aims to develop the computationally frugal Model Agnostic Uncertainty Transfer (MAUT) method to regionalize an uncertainty analysis from a set of donor basins to a receiver. The goal is an evaluation of the MAUT method for regionalizing over sufficiently heterogeneous domains to be applicable to high latitude data sparse regions. New hydrological insights for the regionWe propose the Model Agnostic Uncertainty Transfer (MAUT) method, a surrogate method to perform uncertainty analysis in large-domain modelling with a focus on high-latitude regions where data scarcity is especially severe. With the MAUT method, antecedent precipitation and simulated flow are related. Deviation from this relationship is assumed to represent modelling uncertainty and is quantified by quantile regression lines. These lines act as transfer functions requiring only antecedent precipitation to generate uncertainty bounds. The MAUT method requires uncertainty donors and a target receiver model. Key results suggest the method is relatively insensitive to precipitation dataset differences. Simulation length was the most sensitive input, with 15–20 years being ideal for reasonable results. Overall, the MAUT method is viable for high latitude domains.