Abstract

This paper traces the political debate about the export and the indexation of family benefits in the European Union (EU). We ask why such a technical legal issue has become salient in several EU member states. Explanations building on financial and political justifications prove to be insufficient. Rather, we argue, indexation has to be understood in the broader context of the contestation and constitutionalization of the free movement of workers. Free movement and equal treatment of workers have become contested with Eastern enlargement, but their legal framework is largely removed from political adjustments as it is constitutionalized in the Treaties and progressively interpreted by the Court of Justice (CJEU). At least symbolically, indexation promises to address these economic and legal challenges and serves as an “outlet” for member state governments. We illustrate our argument with empirical evidence from the debates preceding the Brexit referendum and the Austrian reform of family benefits.

Highlights

  • Since 1 January 2019, a Bulgarian working in Austria with a baby living in Bulgaria has been entitled to €51.30 Familienbeihilfe, instead of €114 if the baby was residing in Austria

  • We develop our main argument on indexation as a symbol for the free movement of workers after European Union (EU) Eastern enlargement

  • We argued that this development has to be understood in a broader context of economic and legal challenges of free movement and equal treatment of workers after EU Eastern enlargement

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 1 January 2019, a Bulgarian working in Austria with a baby living in Bulgaria has been entitled to €51.30 Familienbeihilfe (family benefits), instead of €114 if the baby was residing in Austria.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call