Abstract
Animals can adapt to changes in their environment through behavioural or developmental plasticity, but studies of these responses tend to focus on either short-term exposure of adults to the changed conditions, or long-term exposure of juveniles. Juvenile guppies Poecilia reticulata reared in low-light environments have previously been shown to make a sensory switch to using olfactory, rather than visual, cues in foraging. It is not clear whether this compensatory sensory plasticity is limited to juveniles, or whether longer term exposure allows adults to similarly adapt. We investigated how adult guppies that were exposed to light or dark environments for 2 and 4 weeks responded to visual, olfactory and a combination of both food cues, in both dark- and light-test environments. We found that after 2 weeks of exposure, adult guppies were better able to locate a food cue in light test environments regardless of their exposure environment. After 4 weeks, however, guppies were more successful at locating the food cue in the environment they had been exposed to, suggesting that dark-exposed guppies adapted their behaviour in response to their environment. We found that foraging was most successful when both visual and olfactory cues were available and least successful in the presence of olfactory cues, suggesting that the mechanism behind the change in success for dark-exposed guppies was not due to increased reliance on, or sensory switch to olfactory cues.Significance statementHuman-induced environmental change often acts to disrupt an animal’s sensory environment. For example, turbidity can degrade the visual environment, resulting in reduced foraging rates in fish. Juvenile guppies (Poecilia reticulata) can compensate for the reduced visual information available in low-light environments through developmental changes that allow them to rely on an alternative sense, olfaction. This ability, however, may be limited to a critical developmental window, or possible throughout life. Here, we show that while adult guppies are generally better able to locate food resources in well-lit environments, after four (but not two) weeks living under low-light conditions, fish were better able to find food in dark environments than in the light. However, unlike juvenile fish, they did not seem to be relying more on olfactory cues to do so.
Highlights
Animals are often able to respond to sudden, short-term changes in their environment by altering behaviour, an extremely plastic trait
We explore the following hypotheses: a) Developmental plasticity hypothesis Firstly, if adult guppies exposed to low-light environments are able to compensate for reduced visual information in low-light conditions through plastic responses, we predict increased foraging success in low-light environments relative to guppies that have not previously experienced low-light environments. b) Sensory compensation hypothesis
We used proportion tests to compare the proportion of successful trials in dark- and light-test environments, each combination of exposure environment and duration, to explore whether there was an effect of light and test environment on propensity to forage. When considering both 2- and 4-week exposure durations together, we found a significant interaction between test environment and exposure duration (Table 1a)
Summary
Animals are often able to respond to sudden, short-term changes in their environment by altering behaviour, an extremely plastic trait. (Slabbekoorn and Peet 2003) and eutrophication or turbidity in lakes degrades the visual environment, reducing foraging rates and impacting on a range of other behaviours in fishes Adult fish can adjust their behaviour in response to rapid changes in the visual environment: in turbid water, male threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) increase the frequency of mating displays and display more intense red colouration (Candolin et al 2007; Engström-Öst and Candolin 2007), while juvenile cod (Gadus morhua) increase searching activity for food sources (Meagre and Batty 2007). Behavioural plasticity can be limited, if stressors in the environment increase, become permanent, or the animal is unable to effectively move away from the stressor (Schwartz et al 2006; Thomas 2011)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.