Abstract

The traditional way of describing and researching national demonological systems is the character approach. The article attempts to substantiate another possibility of studying Slavic demonology – through the concept of a mythological motive. The motive is understood as a semantic predicate of demonological narratives of various kinds, the minimal meaningful unit of plot composition (including motives-actions, motives-situations, motives-descriptions etc.). The composition of motives in each mythological tradition is unique and can be used to understand the mentality of the people, their way of perception of the world and their attitude to the world. The article describes, with varying degree of detail, some of the motives characteristic of the Carpathian-Ukrainian demonology: motives “to scare a person”, “to lead astray”, telling fairy tales as a protective charm, substitution of babies by demons, motives of double-mindedness, gaining magical power against hail, a circular dance of forest demons and a number of others. Among them, there are world-known, all-Slavic, actually Carpathian-Ukrainian and also Carpathian-Balkan motives. An analysis of these, as well as of other motives, contained in mythological narratives from the collections of V. Hnatiuk, V. Shukhevych, A. Onyschuk and others, allows us to realize the specificity and uniqueness of the Carpathian Ukrainian tradition, and can also provide material for conclusions of an ethnogenetic nature.

Highlights

  • The article attempts to substantiate another possibility of studying Slavic demonology – through the concept of a mythological motive

  • The motive is understood as a semantic predicate of demonological narratives of various kinds, the minimal meaningful unit of plot composition

  • Буданов) Теребовельского пов.) – создание богинками «своего» ребенка из пепла, найденного на припечке, который для этого били прутиками (скорее всего, контаминация библейского мотива создания человека из праха и европейского магического действия колдунов – битья волшебным прутиком); в той же быличке еще один необычный мотив – «пшеничный колос против нечистой силы»: подкидыша растили 7 лет, а поняв, что это ребенок богинки, били его девятью прутиками лозы с привязанными на них девятью пшеничными колосьями – тогда богинка прилетела и заменила ребенка на человеческого (Гнатюк 1912/33: 195-196)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Как и любой другой объект или фрагмент традиционной духовной культуры, народная демонология может изучаться в самых разных ракурсах и аспектах: например, способом исследования персонажного состава какой-нибудь региональной Что же касается самих этих «признаковых» элементов мифологической системы, то они крайне редко выступают как самостоятельный объект изучения вне зависимости от их привязки к тому или иному персонажу.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.