Fly High, Go Deep, Add Value: Characteristics of ‘Black Belt’ Evaluators

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

In this paper I discuss the characteristics of an expert evaluator. My thesis is that the expert evaluator—the ‘black belt’ in the field—is characterised by taking a broad view that sees patterns where others see points; by delving deep for root causes where others see surface explanations; and by emphasising worth and value. This paper is a thought piece and a reflection—its aim is to stimulate debate and discussion rather than to offer definitive conclusions. The intent of this paper is to explore what it is that makes a ‘black belt’ evaluator; that is, someone who is a recognised expert in the area with demonstrated mastery. The thesis of the paper is that expertise/mastery in evaluation involves more that just the superior acquisition of the same set of skills, attributes or competencies that define ‘an evaluator’; rather expertise/mastery involves an additional set of qualities. These additional qualities are taking the macro perspective and a focus on value for the client. The structure of this paper is as follows. After discussing why I think it matters to consider ‘black belt’ evaluators, and what ‘black belt’ means, I describe the work in Australia and New Zealand on evaluator competencies, Next, I consider from a theoretical perspective the nature of competence and expertise before considering how competence models fit within an expert–novice framework. I then draw on the literature on expert–novice differences to hypothesise areas in which expert and novice evaluators might differ.