Abstract

<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'MS Mincho'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB">The paper summarizes changes in the flight planning caused by the introduction of Free Route Airspace Project and suggests possible measures needed to be adopted across the whole system in order to ensure military and civilian aircraft remain segregated in a way that is today ensured by the system of conditional routes. The paper suggests a possible solution in flight planning using existing flight planning tools provided by the CFMU.</span>

Highlights

  • Recent developments in airspace design in Europe aim towards complete withdrawal of airways and using an airspace that is defined solely by waypoints of various nature

  • The conditional routes (CDR) activation is published by an Airspace Management Cells (AMC) in a form of Airspace Use Plan (AUP) and Update Use Plan (UUP)

  • Considering the existence of Europe-wide Free Route Airspace and a withdrawal of the whole route system in Europe, a problem rises for flight planning purposes and for flexible use of airspace

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Recent developments in airspace design in Europe aim towards complete withdrawal of airways and using an airspace that is defined solely by waypoints of various nature. Such airspace tends to be more effective than the conventional routebased system but inevitably loses some of the means the old system provides in an area of adjusting the traffic flow and smooth cooperation between civil and military users of the airspace. A different measure has to be taken in order to ensure such segregation. This measure has to provide flight planning tools for aircraft operators that ensures distribution of information about activated temporary segregated area (TSA) and temporary restricted area (TRA) in a clear way. This article focuses only on operational air traffic (OAT) as it is the most common and most affected by changes in the route system and route availability

FLIGHT INEFFICIENCY
FLEXIBLE USE OF AIRSPACE
FRAP PLANNING SUGGESTIONS
IFPS PLANNING TOOLS
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.