Abstract
The article argues that discourse analysis can help explain why Russian and Norwegian fishery authorities set quotas for the Northeast Arctic cod far above scientific recommendations in 1999–2001. While the “sustainability discourse” dominated on the Norwegian side—framing discussions in terms of whether quotas were “sustainable” or not—the Russian discourse centered around the battle between the two nations involved. According to the “cold peace discourse,” Norway wants to reduce the quota to ensure competitive prices for cod on the world market or, alternatively, simply to “ruin Russia.” The “seafaring community discourse” feeds on distrust on both sides of the border of scientific prognoses and serves to weaken the arguments of the “sustainability discourse” and strengthen the conclusions of the “cold peace discourse.” The “pity-the-Russians discourse” offers a way out of the deadlock: feeding on the Western perception of Russians as “poor,” the Norwegians are ready to set scientific recommendations as...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
