Abstract
What governs tissue organization and movement? If molecular and genetic approaches are able to give some answers on these issues, more and more works are now giving a real importance to mechanics as a key component eventually triggering further signaling events. We chose embryonic cell aggregates as model systems for tissue organization and movement in order to investigate the origin of some mechanical constraints arising from cells organization. Steinberg et al. proposed a long time ago an analogy between liquids and tissues and showed that indeed tissues possess a measurable tissue surface tension and viscosity. We question here the molecular origin of these parameters and give a quantitative measurement of adhesion versus contractility in the framework of the differential interfacial tension hypothesis. Accompanying surface tension measurements by angle measurements (at vertexes of cell-cell contacts) at the cell/medium interface, we are able to extract the full parameters of this model: cortical tensions and adhesion energy. We show that a tunable surface tension and viscosity can be achieved easily through the control of cell-cell contractility compared to cell-medium one. Moreover we show that -catenin is crucial for this regulation to occur: these molecules appear as a catalyser for the remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton underneath cell-cell contact, enabling a differential contractility between the cell-medium and cell-cell interface to take place.
Highlights
Thanks to the pioneer’s work of M
We used the Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH) theory, which has been introduced several years ago in order to accommodate for both the role of adhesion and contractility [17,18,36]
By combining tissue surface tension (TST) measurements and modification of contractile properties of cells, we have seen that our data were fully compatible with the DITH framework
Summary
Thanks to the pioneer’s work of M. As pointed out by Steinberg, the measurement of surface tension with a tensiometer as developed for the first time by Foty [2] and as reimplemented here by the authors is one of the only ways to get access to this equilibrium quantity. In this sense, surface tension is much easier to understand as a difference in free energy between two states attached or not attached
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.