Abstract

It is noted that the benefit of grading test vectors by fault simulation results in a savings of both time and money during the test stage for the detection of manufacturing defects. Accuracy, cost, and processing time are important features to be considered when evaluating fault simulation methods. It is suggested that the answer to which fault simulation solution is right needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It is shown that, although deterministic fault simulators are slow, they are and will be popular in the future because of their accuracy and hostability on general-purpose computers such as CAE (computer-aided engineering) workstations. Parallel processing methods lend themselves very nicely to fault simulation. With the widespread use of CAE workstations that are often connected together via a communication network, the hardware is already configured in a manner that is ready for parallel processing applications. An adequate trade-off between speed and accuracy can be obtained through the use of both a deterministic fault simulator and a statistical-based method. >

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.