Factors controlling the generation and diversity of giant carbonatite-related rare earth element deposits: Insights from the Mianning–Dechang belt

Abstract

As a key source of strategic commodities for advanced technologies, carbonatite-related (carbonatite–nordmarkite complex) rare earth element (REE) deposits are globally important resources. Such deposits have different ore types, scales, ore-formation structures, and evolutionary processes. However, the causes of these variations have not been well studied, which prevents us from understanding the formation of such deposits. The factors that lead to the formation of large carbonatite-related REE deposits have also not been carefully documented. Fortunately, the Cenozoic Mianning–Dechang (MD) REE belt in eastern Tibet contains several medium- and large-scale carbonatite-related REE deposits, including brecciated, weathered, and disseminated ores, providing an ideal opportunity to investigate these factors. Current and this studies show that the deposits in the MD belt have similar formation stages, crystallization sequences, sources, and REE mineralization conditions. Previous studies have shown that the REE mineralization occurred alongside the formation of large-scale overprinted gangue minerals, such as barite, fluorite, and calcite during the lowest-temperature hydrothermal stage (<350 °C), and the REE ores all formed within limited ranges of temperature (247–442 °C) and pressure (< 500 bars). This implies that all the REE minerals formed under the same conditions, that this mineral assemblage (barite + fluorite + calcite + bastnäsite) has higher ore grades (<13%), and that F−, SO42−, and CO2 are important for transporting and precipitating REE. Detailed geological mapping suggests that the variation in ore type was caused by local ore-controlling structures, rather than being due to different depths of formation. Bastnäsite has similar initial 87Sr/86Sr (0.7059–0.7080), 143Nd/144Nd (0.5123–0.5124), 207Pb/204Pb (15.594–15.648), and 208Pb/204Pb (38.422–71.488) ratios along the whole belt, implying that all the deposits have the same source and the REE were sourced directly from a mixture of crustal and mantle material. The C–O isotopic compositions of the carbonatites (δ18OV-SMOW = 6.4‰ to 10.5‰, δ13CV-PDB = − 3.9‰ to − 8.5‰) and bastnäsite (δ18OV-SMOW = 9.5‰–16.3‰, δ13CV-PDB = − 4.7‰ to − 9.3‰) suggest that low-temperature alteration occurred along with REE mineralization. Development of pegmatitic stage and aegirine–augite and arfvedsonite fenitization alteration may promote the formation of large-scale REE deposits. The giant Maoniuping and Dalucao deposits both had pegmatitic stages that involved the formation of coarse-grained barite, fluorite, and calcite with REE contents of up to 6305 ppm, suggesting the pegmatitic stage suggest another REE enrichment event after the magmatic stage, and large-scale REE mineralization. The intense alkali alteration that forms arfvedsonite and aegirine–augite in carbonatite–nordmarkite complexes was only found in the Maoniuping deposit, whereas biotitation was found in the Dalucao and Lizhuang deposits. This suggests that the Maoniuping deposit experienced more intense alteration, which may have led to more effective REE migration from the wallrock into the ore-forming fluids. The mantle source, the evolution of the magma, the presence of a pegmatitic stage, the composition of the fluids, and the high degree of alkaline alteration could have affected the scale of the deposits, in addition to the large volume of carbonatite–nordmarkite complexes and multiple phases of tectonism.