Abstract
Isopiestic measurements in dry methyl isobutyl ketone (Hexone), with tri 2-ethyl hexyl phosphoric acid as monomeric standard, show both mono 2-ethyl hexyl phosphoric acid, ( C 2 H 5· C 8 H 12 O) PO( OH) 2, H 2 MEHP, and 2-ethyl hexyl phosphonic acid, ( C 2 H 5· C 6 H 12 O) PO( OH) 2, H 2[ EHP] to be essentially dimeric, the respective number of formula weights per aggregate being measured as 2·4 and 2·3. Assuming the extractants to be dimeric under extraction conditions (wet Hexone) the extraction of Am(III), Eu(III) and Tm(III), as representatives of M 3+, and of Ca(II) and U(VI) i.e. UO 2 2+, as of M 2+, in the H 2Y (Hexone) vs. HCl system may be presented as: H 2 Y is H 2 MEHP: M δ 3+ + 2·5( H 2 Y) 2 o ⇌ M( HY)( H 2 Y 2) 2 o + 3 H δ+ H 2 Y is H 2[ EHP]: M δ 3+ + 3( H 2 Y) 2 o ⇌ M( H 2 Y 2) 2 o + 3 H δ+ H 2 Y is H 2 MEHP or H 2[ EHP]: M δ 3+ + 2( H 2 Y) 2 o ⇌ M( H 2 Y 2) 2 o + 2 H δ+ In H 2MEHP (diluent) vs. HCl systems, comparison of extractant dependency of the K for Eu(III) is made for toluene (non hydrogen bonding), Hexone (hydrogen bond acceptor) and n-decanol (hydrogen bond donor and acceptor) as diluent. The variation of log K with Z for lanthanides(III) in 0·30 F extractant (Hexone) vs. 0·0625 F HCl shows H 2[EHP] to be the more promising extracting for mutual separation of lanthanides (III).
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.