Abstract
The aim of this study was to verify if external factors influence persistence in online courses in higher education. These external factors, borrowed from Kember’s (1995) model, included some students’ characteristics; cost benefits; social integration of adult students (enrolment encouragement, study encouragement, and family support); and external attribution (insufficient time, events hindering study, and distractions). Data were collected among a sample of 835 students from two Canadian French-Speaking Universities (n1 = 468 from University One and n2 = 367 from University Two) using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire included items borrowed from The Distance Education Student Progress (DESP) inventory (Kember et al., 1992). The multiple linear hierarchical regression analysis revealed that students’ characteristics and some of the external factors had an effect on students’ persistence in online courses and that the most important factor in predicting students’ persistence is cost benefits. These analyses were also conducted by university, gender, and age groups. Except for cost benefits, the results indicated different patterns of strength and significant relationships between groups.
Highlights
Over the past two decades, the number of online courses has grown considerably in higher education (Myers & Schiltz, 2012; Shea & Bidjerano, 2013)
An often-cited meta-analysis of 232 comparative studies conducted by Bernard et al (2004) concluded that, overall, online courses and face-to-face courses are comparable on some student outcomes
The study revealed that academic performance was higher for online students as compared to those registered in face-to-face courses
Summary
Over the past two decades, the number of online courses has grown considerably in higher education (Myers & Schiltz, 2012; Shea & Bidjerano, 2013). They meet the demands of students who desire flexible course schedules, especially those of adult students They give students better access to higher education; these students would not attend face-to-face courses because of family and/or work responsibilities, not to mention their distance from higher education institutions. An often-cited meta-analysis of 232 comparative studies conducted by Bernard et al (2004) concluded that, overall, online courses and face-to-face courses are comparable on some student outcomes (academic performance and satisfaction). The study revealed that academic performance was higher for online students as compared to those registered in face-to-face courses
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
