Extending the Educational Planning Discourse: Conceptual and Paradigmatic Explorations

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessFocus: Approaches to Research in Comparative EducationExtending the Educational Planning Discourse: Conceptual and Paradigmatic ExplorationsDon AdamsDon Adams Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Comparative Education Review Volume 32, Number 4Nov., 1988 Sponsored by the Comparative and International Education Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/446793 Views: 78Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The Comparative and International Education SocietyPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Shuo Xu, Congcong Wang, Xin An, Liyuan Hao, Guancan Yang A novel developmental trajectory discovery approach by integrating main path analysis and intermediacy, Journal of Information Science (Jun 2022): 016555152211018.https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221101835Val D. Rust, Amanda Kenderes Paulston and Paradigms, (Jan 2011): 19–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-722-6_2Moosung Lee, Tom Friedrich Citation Network Analysis of Comparative Education Texts, (Jan 2011): 113–144.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-722-6_7Tally Hatzakis, Mark Lycett, Alan Serrano A programme management approach for ensuring curriculum coherence in IS (higher) education, European Journal of Information Systems 16, no.55 (Dec 2017): 643–657.https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000707 David Baker , Helmut Köhler , and Manfred Stock Socialist Ideology and the Contraction of Higher Education: Institutional Consequences of State Manpower and Education Planning in the Former East Germany Baker, Köhler, and Stock, Comparative Education Review 51, no.33 (Jul 2015): 353–377.https://doi.org/10.1086/518481 TABLE 2. Main arguments of global perspectives on school decentralization., (Jun 2004): 283–298.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203463512-39 Mark B. Ginsburg and Jorge M. Gorostiaga Relationships between Theorists/Researchers and Policy Makers/Practitioners: Rethinking the Two‐Cultures Thesis and the Possibility of Dialogue Ginsburg & Gorostiaga, Comparative Education Review 45, no.22 (Jul 2015): 173–196.https://doi.org/10.1086/447660Don Adams Extending educational planning discourse: A new strategic planning model, Asia Pacific Education Review 1, no.11 (Dec 2000): 31–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03026144Adam E. Nir Strategic Plans and Principals’ Needs for Control, Journal of School Leadership 10, no.44 (Jan 2019): 332–345.https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460001000403T. Husén Research Paradigms in Education, (Jan 1999): 31–39.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043349-3/50004-9W. van den Bor, I. Wallace, G. Nagy, C. Garforth Curriculum development in a European context: an account of a collaborative project, European Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 2, no.11 (Jun 1995): 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1080/13892249585300031Robert H. Beach Emerging Perspectives on Planning and Change Processes, Journal of School Leadership 3, no.66 (Jan 2019): 646–665.https://doi.org/10.1177/105268469300300604Dan E. Inbar Educational Planning: The Transformation of Symbols, Frames of Reference, and Behavior, Educational Policy 7, no.22 (Jun 1993): 166–183.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904893007002003Adriaan M. Verspoor Planning of education: Where do we go?, International Journal of Educational Development 12, no.33 (Jul 1992): 233–244.https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(92)90048-QDan E. Inbar Planning for Choice: The Educational Sociotechnological Challenge of the Future, Educational Policy 6, no.11 (Jul 2016): 3–18.https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904892006001001Don Adams, Catherine Cornbleth, David Plank Between exhortation and reform—Recent U.S. experience with educational change, Interchange 19, no.3-43-4 (Sep 1988): 121–134.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807107