Abstract

The analysis of modern theories of text understanding are presented in the article. Different theoretical methods and techniques were used for this purpose: deductive and inductive methods, analysis and synthesis, generalization, systematization and modeling as well as some interpretive methods that are based on specific principles of systemic, activity, cognitive and organizational approaches. The author notes that six approaches to the interpretation of understanding can beaccented in modern psychological literature. They are understanding as knowledge, understanding as comprehension, understanding as interpretation, understanding as a process of solving tasks, understanding as the inclusion of new knowledge in the subject's experience, understanding as awareness. But only four of them are used to understand the text. The conclusion is made as a result of systematization of the achievements of these approaches. It is concluded that the process of text understanding is a complex process that occurs at several levels: from the simplest to perception, through interpretation (thinking and memory), to a higher level that is consciousness, where emotional identification and awareness are presented. As a result of understanding someorganized ideas about the text (model, conclusions, mental representation) appear in the mind of the subject. Next they recieve the verbal form and objectify as a secondary text (received from the recipient as a reaction to the read text), that represented concept or secondary meanings. The process and the result of text understanding depend on some subjective factors (the recipient experience (apperception), subjective state at the time of reception, the cultural and historical context) and some objective factors (textual or semantic dominants). Context forms not only preliminary expectations, but also verifies the final result of understanding. It is anew secondary meanings, that accord with already existing senses in the mind. Thus the semantic level of reader consciousness enrich and reorganize, that are represented as change in behavior.

Highlights

  • Розуміння тексту як специфічний вид розуміння розуміння тексту з визначенням послідовності та етапів цього процесу, його внутрішнього змісту та кінцевого результату за умови врахування чинників, які визначають сутнісні особливості розуміння

  • Що ґрунтуються на конкретних принципах системного, діяльнісного, когнітивного та організаційного підходів

  • В результаті розуміння у свідомості суб’єкта виникають певні організовані уявлення щодо тексту (модель, висновки, ментальна репрезентація), які в подальшому набувають вербальної форми, об’єктивуючись як вторинний текст (отриманий від реципієнта як реакція на прочитаний текст), у якому репрезентовані поняття або вторинні смисли

Read more

Summary

Розуміння як осмислення

У всьому є сенс, потрібно лише його знайти і відновити. Лурия, 1975; Автономова & Филатов, 1981; Чепелєва, 1992; Морозкина & Насанбаева, 2013; Орап, 2014; Foucart, Romero-Rivas, Gort & Costa, 2016; Bitan, Kaftory, Meiri-Leib, Eviatar & Peleg, 2017; Sharon & ThompsonSchill, 2017; Giustolisi, Vergallito, Cecchetto, Varoli & Lauro, 2018; Houghton, 2018; Mason, Scrimin, Zaccoletti, Tornatora & Goetz, 2018

Розуміння як Розуміння може
Розуміння як усвідомлення
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.