Abstract

The daily average land surface air temperature (SAT) simulated by 8 CMIP5 models historical experiments and that from NCEP data during 1960–2005, are used to evaluate the performance of the CMIP5 model based on detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) method. The DFA results of NCEP data show that SAT in most regions of the world exhibit long-range correlation. The scaling exponents of NCEP SAT show the zonal distribution characteristics of larg in tropics while small in medium and high latitudes. The distribution characteristics of the zonal average scaling exponents of CMCC-CMS, GFDL-ESM2G, IPSL-CM5A-MR are similar to that of NCEP data. From the DFA errors of model-simulated SAT, the performance of IPSL-CM5A-MR is the best among the 8 models throughout the year, the performance of FGOALS-g2 is good in spring and summer, GFDL-ESM2G is the best in autumn, CNRM-CM5 and CMCC-CMS is good in winter. The scaling exponents of model-simulated SAT are closer to that of NCEP data in most areas of the mid-high latitude on the northern hemisphere. However, simulations of SAT in East Asia and Central North American are generally less effective. In spring, most models have better performance in Siberian (SIB), Central Asia (CAS) and Tibetan (TIB). SAT in Northern Europe area are well simulated by most models in summer. In autumn, areas with better performance of most models are Mediterranean, SIB and TIB regions. In winter, SAT in Greenland, SIB and TIB areas are well simulated by most models. Generally speaking, the performance of CMIP5 models for SAT on global continents varies in different seasons and different regions.

Highlights

  • Climate system models are important tools for simulating climate systems and projecting future climate change (Phillips and Gleckler, 2006; Zhou and Yu, 2006; Flato et al, 2013)

  • We quantitatively evaluate the performance of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project-Phase 5 (CMIP5) models in simulating long-range correlation (LRC) of global daily land surface air temperature (SAT) by means of comparing the difference with LRC of National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)-2 data in this study

  • Compared with the scaling exponents of NCEP SAT, more than 60% of the detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) differences of CMCC-CMS, CNRM-CM5, GFDL-ESM2G, IPSL-CM5A-MR and MPI-ESMMR are not significant at a significance level of 0.05, which means the performance is good in most of global continents

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate system models are important tools for simulating climate systems and projecting future climate change (Phillips and Gleckler, 2006; Zhou and Yu, 2006; Flato et al, 2013). The evaluation methods for model performance concentrate more on quantitative assessment than before, and emphasize the model evaluation criteria (Kharin et al, 2013; Elguindi et al, 2014; Sillmann et al, 2014). Most of these methods evaluate the outputs of multi-models on variant timescales, focusing on the climate states, climate change, or variations of indexes computed by meteorological elements (Sillmann et al, 2013; Yin et al, 2013; Jiang et al, 2016; Li et al, 2017), and provide the quantitative results of the differences between the model simulations and observations. The performance of models on simulating the intrinsic dynamical characteristics of climate system is rarely evaluated

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call