Abstract

In this study, the applicability of three gridded datasets was evaluated (Climatic Research Unit (CRU) Time Series (TS) 3.1, “Asian Precipitation—Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration Toward the Evaluation of Water Resources” (APHRODITE)_V1101, and the climate forecast system reanalysis dataset (CFSR)) in different combinations against observational data for predicting the hydrology of the Upper Vakhsh River Basin (UVRB) in Central Asia. Water balance components were computed, the results calibrated with the SUFI-2 approach using the calibration of soil and water assessment tool models (SWAT–CUP) program, and the performance of the model was evaluated. Streamflow simulation using the SWAT model in the UVRB was more sensitive to five parameters (ALPHA_BF, SOL_BD, CN2, CH_K2, and RCHRG_DP). The simulation for calibration, validation, and overall scales showed an acceptable correlation between the observed and simulated monthly streamflow for all combination datasets. The coefficient of determination (R2) and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) showed “excellent” and “good” values for all datasets. Based on the R2 and NSE from the “excellent” down to “good” datasets, the values were 0.91 and 0.92 using the observational datasets, CRU TS3.1 (0.90 and 0.90), APHRODITE_V1101+CRU TS3.1 (0.74 and 0.76), APHRODITE_V1101+CFSR (0.72 and 0.78), and CFSR (0.67 and 0.74) for the overall scale (1982–2006). The mean annual evapotranspiration values from the UVRB were about 9.93% (APHRODITE_V1101+CFSR), 25.52% (APHRODITE_V1101+CRU TS3.1), 2.9% (CFSR), 21.08% (CRU TS3.1), and 27.28% (observational datasets) of annual precipitation (186.3 mm, 315.7 mm, 72.1 mm, 256.4 mm, and 299.7 mm, out of 1875.9 mm, 1236.9 mm, 2479 mm, 1215.9 mm, and 1098.5 mm). The contributions of the snowmelt to annual runoff were about 81.06% (APHRODITE_V1101+CFSR), 63.12% (APHRODITE_V1101+CRU TS3.1), 82.79% (CFSR), 81.66% (CRU TS3.1), and 67.67% (observational datasets), and the contributions of rain to the annual flow were about 18.94%, 36.88%, 17.21%, 18.34%, and 32.33%, respectively, for the overall scale. We found that gridded climate datasets can be used as an alternative source for hydrological modeling in the Upper Vakhsh River Basin in Central Asia, especially in scarce-observation regions. Water balance components, simulated by the SWAT model, provided a baseline understanding of the hydrological processes through which water management issues can be dealt with in the basin.

Highlights

  • Watershed-based hydrological models provide a practical approach to evaluating the water cycle’s components, snowmelt’s contribution to river flow [1,2]

  • The model results of the overall test performance of the calibration indicated an overestimation of the peak flow for the APHRODITE_V1101+climate forecast system reanalysis (CFSR), CFSR, Climatic Research Unit (CRU) TS3.1, and observational data by 15%, 2%, 0.29% and 5.21% respectively, whereas, for the APHRODITE_V1101+CRU TS3.1, the results showed an underestimation of peak flow by −10.80% (Table 2)

  • Our results indicated that a second alternative source for the hydrological simulation of the Upper Vakhsh River Basin (UVRB) with the SWAT model could be the combination of precipitation with APHRODITE_V1101 and maximum/minimum temperature with CRU TS3.1, followed by the combination of APHRODITE_V1101 and CFSR, and CFSR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Watershed-based hydrological models provide a practical approach to evaluating the water cycle’s components, snowmelt’s contribution to river flow [1,2]. One of the challenges in mountainous regions when modeling watershed hydrology and evaluating water balance components is obtaining weather input data, which are generally among the most essential drivers of watershed models [3]. Observational climate stations are often sparsely located and cannot characterize the climate conditions throughout a catchment, if large hydroclimatic gradients exist. Climate station measurements often do not cover the proposed modeling period, and there may be gaps in the records. In order to solve this issue, the investigation of alternative climate data is essential in mountainous areas. The applicability of the climate forecast system reanalysis (CFSR), “Asian Precipitation—

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call