Abstract

Hydro-climatological study is difficult in most of the developing countries due to the paucity of monitoring stations. Gridded climatological data provides an opportunity to extrapolate climate to areas without monitoring stations based on their ability to replicate the Spatio-temporal distribution and variability of observed datasets. Simple correlation and error analyses are not enough to predict the variability and distribution of precipitation and temperature. In this study, the coefficient of correlation (R2), Root mean square error (RMSE), mean bias error (MBE) and mean wet and dry spell lengths were used to evaluate the performance of three widely used daily gridded precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature datasets from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU), Princeton University Global Meteorological Forcing (PGF) and Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) datasets available over the Niger Delta part of Nigeria. The Standardised Precipitation Index was used to assess the confidence of using gridded precipitation products on water resource management. Results of correlation, error, and spell length analysis revealed that the CRU and PGF datasets performed much better than the CFSR datasets. SPI values also indicate a good association between station and CRU precipitation products. The CFSR datasets in comparison with the other data products in many years overestimated and underestimated the SPI. This indicates weak accuracy in predictability, hence not reliable for water resource management in the study area. However, CRU data products were found to perform much better in most of the statistical assessments conducted. This makes the methods used in this study to be useful for the assessment of various gridded datasets in various hydrological and climatic applications.

Highlights

  • The accuracy and reliability of climate datasets are crucial for scientific research and hydrologic studies related to climate change impact assessment, numerical weather prediction, flood forecasting, drought monitoring or water resources management [1]

  • The graphs comparing the distribution of the monthly mean for the station, Climatic Research Unit (CRU), Princeton University Global Meteorological Forcing (PGF) and Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) daily precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature datasets of the study area are shown in Figures 2(a)-(f) respectively

  • Results of (a) descriptive statistics describing the characteristics of the datasets are summarised in Table 1, and the statistical indicators are summarised in Table 2, respectively. These results and figures show that the CRU and PGF datasets performed very well in depicting the study areas datasets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accuracy and reliability of climate datasets are crucial for scientific research and hydrologic studies related to climate change impact assessment, numerical weather prediction, flood forecasting, drought monitoring or water resources management [1]. Getting data observations at an acceptable spatial resolution is challenging in developing countries, and where available, their quality is either poor or expensive and may poorly represent a study area with large hydroclimatic gradients [5] [6]. To overcome these challenges, researchers resort to the use of multilayer global gridded representations of meteorological data to serve as inputs into climate and hydrological modelling studies [6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call