Evaluation of rectal swab use for the determination of enteric pathogens: a prospective study of diarrhoea in adults

Abstract

ObjectivesA stool sample is the sample of choice for microbiological testing of enteric pathogens causing diarrhoea, but a rectal swab can be a more practical alternative. A prospective observational study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of flocked rectal swab specimens using the syndromic molecular approach to determine the aetiology of diarrhoea in adults. MethodsWe compared the performance of rectal swabs with stool samples as the reference standard in determining viral, bacterial and protozoal pathogens using real-time multiplex PCR as well as standard stool culture. Paired samples of stool and rectal swab specimens were collected from 304 adult patients with diarrhoea, presented at the Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, between June 2016 and August 2017. ResultsOverall sensitivity of rectal swab samples in the syndromic molecular approach was 83.2% (95% CI 77.2%–88.1%). Pathogen group-specific analysis of rectal swabs showed sensitivity of 65.6% (95% CI 52.7%–77.1%) for viruses and 57.1% (95% CI 28.9%–82.3%) for parasites. For bacteria, sensitivity was 86.5% (95% CI 79.5%–91.8%) when PCR was performed and 61.4% (95% CI 52.4%–69.9%) when culture for bacteria was performed. Mean threshold cycle (Ct) values for most pathogens were higher in rectal swab specimens than in stool specimens. ConclusionsOur results indicate that rectal swabs can be used in the diagnosis of diarrhoea in adults when stool specimens are not available or when rapid aetiological determination is needed. However, rectal swabs should be analysed using a molecular approach. The mean Ct value for most pathogens is higher in rectal swab specimens than in stool specimens.