Abstract

Evapotranspiration represents a significant part on the water balance and, thus, the correct evaluation of this hydrological parcel is relevant when modeling a watershed. The objective of this work is to evaluate the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model’s capability in adequately simulating evapotranspiration in a watershed with predominance of the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Hydrological modeling of the Gama watershed located in the Federal District, which has 57.5% of its total area covered by pristine Cerrado, was conducted. Hydrometeorological and turbulent flow variables have been monitored in weather station and Eddy Covariance (EC) tower, respectively. SWAT simulations were performed for potential evapotranspiration methods: Hargreaves (H), Priestley–Taylor (PT) and Penman–Monteith (PM). Modified versions of SWAT for estimating actual (ET) by Strauch and Volk (2013) (SV) and Arroio Junior (2016) (AR) were also tested. The calibration and verification of the SWAT model, in terms of daily flow, were carried out using a Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm, and fair results were obtained with all the methods evaluated. The actual evapotranspiration (ET) simulated with SWAT (ETsim) using the PM, PT, H, SV and AR methods for a Cerrado hydrological response unit (HRU) were evaluated and compared with the ET obtained using the turbulent flow (Eddy Covariance) method (ETobs). Comparing ETobs and ETsim results, the PM method showed the best fitness and the H and PT methods showed better fit for the dry and the rainy periods, respectively. Although representing an advance on ET modeling, the SV and AR modifications did not improve the response in terms of simulation of the studied area.

Highlights

  • Cerrado is the predominant land cover in the Ribeirão do Gama basin, representing 57.5% of the total area, in addition to the occurrence of urban

  • We analyzed the actual evapotranspiration of a pristine Brazilian Cerrado vegetation biome, comparing simulated values to the values estimated by turbulent flow Eddy Covariance (EC) tower data

  • The actual evapotranspiration obtained by EC (ETobs) compared to actual evapotranspiration simulated with Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) (ETsim), using the PM, PT, H, Strauch and Volk [18] (SV) and AR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evapotranspiration combines water losses to the atmosphere through soil evaporation and vegetation transpiration, and represents the second most important component in the assessment of the hydrological cycle [1]. Determining evapotranspiration using hydrological models is still a challenge, especially due to the limited availability of evapotranspiration data or meteorological variables necessary for its estimation [2,3,4,5]. Another obstacle is the selection of the appropriate method to represent the complexity of this process in hydrological models [5,6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call