Abstract

Applications of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model typically involve delineation of a watershed into subwatersheds/subbasins that are then further subdivided into hydrologic response units (HRUs) which are homogeneous areas of aggregated soil, landuse, and slope and are the smallest modeling units used within the model. In a given standard SWAT application, multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) in a subbasin are usually aggregated into a single HRU feature. In other words, the standard version of the model combines multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) with the same landuse/landcover, soil, and slope, but located at different places of a subbasin (spatially non-unique), and considers them as one HRU. In this study, ArcGIS pre-processing procedures were developed to spatially define a one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs (spatially unique HRUs) within a subbasin prior to SWAT simulations to facilitate input processing, input/output mapping, and further analysis at the individual farm field level. Model input data such as landuse/landcover (LULC), soil, crop rotation, and other management data were processed through these HRUs. The SWAT model was then calibrated/validated for Raccoon River watershed in Iowa for 2002–2010 and Big Creek River watershed in Illinois for 2000–2003. SWAT was able to replicate annual, monthly, and daily streamflow, as well as sediment, nitrate and mineral phosphorous within recommended accuracy in most cases. The one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs created and used in this study is a first step in performing LULC change, climate change impact, and other analyses in a more spatially explicit manner.

Highlights

  • Watershed heterogeneity and limitations associated with monitoring make it impractical to measure every aspect of the hydrological system (Pechlivanidis et al 2011)

  • Based on availability of data and previous research, two watersheds in the midwestern U.S have been selected for this study (Fig. 1): (1) the Big Creek River watershed (BRW) in Illinois, which is a combination of two HUC12 or 12-digit watersheds (USGS (U.S Geological Survey) 2012), and (2) the Raccoon River watershed (RRW) in Iowa, which is a combination of two HUC8 or ‘‘8-digit’’ watersheds (USGS (U.S Geological Survey) 2012)

  • Some of the LULC changes above may look objectionable at first glance; it should be noted these changes are similar to those that are inevitable if threshold levels are used in Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to eliminate minor LULCs during hydrologic response units (HRUs) definition

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Watershed heterogeneity and limitations associated with monitoring make it impractical to measure every aspect of the hydrological system (Pechlivanidis et al 2011). Hydrological models are frequently used to overcome these limitations and extrapolate information from available measurements in both time and space to the watershed. Ecohydrological models are important for a wide range of applications such as water resources planning, watershed development and management, flood prediction and design, water quality evaluation, hydro-ecology, and climate change analyses. Applications of SWAT typically involve delineation of a watershed into subwatersheds/subbasins that are further subdivided into hydrologic response units (HRUs). The incorporation of HRUs in SWAT has provided flexibility for simulating a broad spectrum of conditions and supports adaptation of the model for watershed scales ranging from small field plots to entire river basins (Gassman et al 2007)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call