Abstract

Factors such as sample deformation, which comes from the applied force, and the probe shape, which results in image dilation, lead to the errors in the measurement of roughness by atomic force microscopy (AFM). We explored the roughness errors that result from the applied imaging force, different probe materials, and the probe radius in the roughness measurements of a polysilicon film surface. Structures with high spatial frequencies, which are strongly affected by the probe shape, were separated by comparing radial power spectrum density curves. A geometrical model was established to describe the roughness–probe radius relationship, which was compared with experimental results under optimized imaging conditions. For a surface with a small correlation length WCL = 14.1 nm comparable to the radius of a commercial probe (Rt<10 nm), a probe with a 7 nm radius contributes an error of around 43.7%. To achieve a precise measurement of the roughness of such a surface, it is important to develop a suitable model that describes the roughness distribution well.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.