Abstract

Aims and Objectives: The present research was undertaken to study the diagnostic utility of TBSRTC at our institution and correlate the cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis wherever available. Methods: A total of 108 patients with thyroid swellings were subjected to fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) during a period of 10 months i.e. from January 2016 to October 2016 were included in the study. Out of these 31 patients (28.70%) underwent surgery subsequently and histopathological examination was done. Cytological diagnosis was compared with histopathology diagnosis wherever it was available. Results: Out of 108 patients, majority were females (87.03%) and in younger age group (n = 66 [61.11%], 21–40 years). The FNAC diagnosis was categorized as unsatisfactory (2.77%), benign (87.03%), Atypia of Undetermined Significance (0.92%), Follicular/ Hurthle cell neoplasm (4.62%), suspicious for malignancy (0.92%) and malignant (3.70%). The malignancy rate for benign category was 4.5%, 20% for follicular neoplasm, 100% for each suspicious for malignancy and malignant category. 29 cases (93.54%) out of 31 had a consistent cytological diagnosis with histological diagnosis while 2 cases (6.45%) showed discordance. There was a good correlation between cytological and histopathological diagnosis. Conclusion: The Bethesda system is very useful standardized system of reporting thyroid cytopathology. It improves communication between cytopathologist's and clinicians, leading to more consistent management approaches.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call