Abstract

ABSTRACT The discrepancies in data across different phases and the unexplored optimal spatial resolution present challenges when using multi-temporal canopy height models to accurately discern actual forest growth. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of bi-temporal CHMs to characterize growth changes in a boreal natural forest over a four-year period. A maximum mosaic method was introduced to construct a CHM from various flight strips, aimed at minimizing data alignment errors. Subsequently, the canopy height and height changed derived from six different height percentile metrics and five spatial resolutions were evaluated. The results showed that higher resolution (e.g., < 2 m) and lower height metrics (e.g., 85th height percentile) consistently underestimated. Tree growth correlation with individual segmentation surpassed field-measurements at all resolutions and height metrics. for the optimal resolution and height metrics, the results suggest that using a 95th height percentile the 10 m scale effectively represents both canopy height ( R 2012 2 = 0.95, RMS E 2012 = 0.88 m, rRMS E 2012 = 5.83%; R 2016 2 = 0.96, RMS E 2016 = 1.11 m, rRMS E 2016 = 6.91%) and height changes ( R 2 = 0.59, RMSE = 0.86 m, rRMSE = 18.38%). This study demonstrates the necessity of carefully evaluating data characteristics and resolutions when employing multi-temporal CHM for forest dynamics monitoring.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.