Ethology: The Biology of Behavior.Irenaus Eibl-Eibesfeldt , Erich Klinghammer

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNew Biological BooksEthology: The Biology of Behavior. Irenaus Eibl-Eibesfeldt , Erich Klinghammer Jack P. HailmanJack P. Hailman Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Quarterly Review of Biology Volume 46, Number 4Dec., 1971 Published in association with Stony Brook University Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/407074 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:David P. Barash Human ethology and human sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 26–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060428Jerome H. Barkow Human ethology: Empirical wealth, theoretical dearth, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 27–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006043XBurton Benedict The dangers of analogy in human ethology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 27–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060441Ned Block A confusion about innateness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 27–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060453Robert C. Bolles The functional significance of behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 29–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060465Gerald Borgia Levels of selection and human ethology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 30–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060477William R. Charlesworth “It's true, but we don't know why:” Problems in validating human ethological hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 30–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060489José M. R. Delgado Cerebral building blocks and behavioral mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 31–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060490Gordon E. Finley Cross-cultural methodology and ethological universals, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 32–33.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060507Peter J. Fraser Analogy and dimensions of behaviour, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 33–33.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060519Michael T. Ghiselin Has human ethology rediscovered Darwinism?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 33–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060520Gilbert Gottlieb Classical ethology's conception of ontogenetic development, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 34–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060532Jack P. Hailman The ethology behind human ethology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 35–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060544Glenn Hausfater An eclectric history of ethological theory and methods, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 36–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060556Howard S. Hoffman The problem of human ethology from the perspective of an experimental psychologist, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 37–38.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060568David L. Hull Universality and species specificity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 38–39.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006057XCarroll E. Izard Human ethology and the ontogeny of emotional expressions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 39–39.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060581Peter H. Klopfer What the ethologist's eye tells the ethologist's brain, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 39–40.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060593Joseph K. Kovach “It just depends on what one wants to know”: Eibl-Eibesfeldt's Human Ethology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 40–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0006060XH. P. Lipp Brain complexity enhances speed of behavioral evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 42–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060611Ashley Montagu “Instincts,” infants, adults, and behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 42–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060623Steven A. Peterson On human ethology: some methodological comments, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 43–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060635Glendon Schubert Classical Ethology: concepts and implications for human ethology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 44–46.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060647Pierre L. van den Berghe Ethology versus sociobiology: competitive displays, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 46–48.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060659Douglas Wahlsten Some logical fallacies in the classical ethological point of view, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 48–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060660S. L. Washburn Ethologists do not study human evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 49–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060672Edward O. Wilson Ethology and sociobiology: a point of definition, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 49–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060684I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt Human ethology: methods and limits, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2, no.11 (May 2011): 50–57.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00060696