Economics of Postwar Fertility in Japan: Differentials and Trends: Comment

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessEconomics of Postwar Fertility in Japan: Differentials and Trends: CommentGary R. SaxonhouseGary R. Saxonhouse Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Journal of Political Economy Volume 82, Number 2, Part 2Mar. - Apr., 1974Part 2: Marriage, Family Human Capital, and Fertility Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/260300 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 28Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1974 The National Bureau of Economic ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Daniel R. Vining Social versus reproductive success: The central theoretical problem of human sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 167–187.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00021968Carl Jay Bajema Passion for sexual pleasure, the measurement of selection, and prospects for eugenics, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 187–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00021981Jerome H. Barkow Central problems of sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 188–188.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00021993Hiram Caton Sound and shoddy sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 188–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022007Martin Daly, Margo Wilson A theoretical challenge to a caricature of Darwinism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 189–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022019Richard Dawkins Wealth, polygyny, and reproductive success, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 190–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022020Irenäus Eibl-Eibesfeldt Intelligence and selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 191–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022032James R. Flynn Sociobiology and IQ trends over time, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 192–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022044Robin Fox Fitness by any other name, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 192–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022056Steven J. C. Gaulin The use and abuse of sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 193–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022068Michael T. Ghiselin, Francesco M. Scudo The bioeconomics of phenotypic selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 194–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002207XJohn Hartung Proximate mechanisms and distal objectives, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 196–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022081J. Hill Success in a dual evolutionary model, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 196–197.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022093William Irons Social and reproductive success: Useful data but rethink the theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 197–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002210XHillard Kaplan, Kim Hill Sexual strategies and social-class differences in fitness in modern industrial societies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 198–201.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022111Philip Kitcher The trouble with human sociobiology is …, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 201–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022123Jeffrey A. Kurland Proletarian hominids on the rampage, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 202–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022135Richard Lynn, Susan Hampson Further evidence for secular increases in intelligence in Britain, Japan, and the United States, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 203–204.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022147Euan M. Macphail Fertility, intelligence, and socioeconomic status: No cause for surprise or alarm, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 204–205.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022159James V. Neel The “eugenic dilemma” revisited, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 205–205.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022160Robert D. Retherford Demography and sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 205–206.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022172James Silverberg, J. Patrick Gray What is sociobiology's central dogma?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 206–207.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022184Robert J. Sternberg What is adaptive?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 207–208.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022196Donald Symons Sociobiology and Darwinism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 208–209.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022202Leigh M. Van Valen, Virginia C. Maiorana Surrogate resources, cumulative selection, and fertility, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 209–209.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022214James D. Weinrich Intelligence, reproductive success, and social status: A complicated relationship, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 209–210.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022226Kenneth M. Weiss Avarice aforethought and the fundamental premise of sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 210–211.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00022238B. J. Williams Rejecting sociobiological hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 9, no.11 (Feb 2010): 211–211.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002224X