Reply to Hailman

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessLetters to the EditorsReply to HailmanAnthony FergusonAnthony Ferguson Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 111, Number 977Jan. - Feb., 1977 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283148 Views: 2Total views on this site Citations: 26Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1977 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Donald Symons Précis of The evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 171–181.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000412XJohn Alcock Beyond the sociobiology of sexuality: predictive hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 181–182.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004131Irwin S. Bernstein Motives, intentions, science, and sex, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 182–183.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004143Donald A. Dewsbury Methods in the two sociobiologies, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 183–184.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004155Milton Diamond The biosocial evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 184–186.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004167H. J. Eysenck Sociobiology - standing on one leg, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 186–186.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004179Ted L. Huston, Gilbert Geis Forcible rape and human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 186–187.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004180Michael T. Ghiselin Is sex sufficient?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 187–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004192Jack P. Hailman Fitness, function, fidelity, fornication, and feminine philandering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 189–189.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004209Julia R. Heiman Selecting for a sociobiological fit, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 189–190.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004210Mark R. Hoffman An interactionist perspective on human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 190–191.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004222Glenn E. King Pair bonding and proximal mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 191–192.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004234Michael E. Lamb On the origins and implications of sex differences in human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 192–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004246J. B. Lancaster, C. S. Lancaster The division of labor and the evolution of human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–193.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004258W. C. McGrew The proper study of sociobiological mankind is sex, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 193–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000426XDiane McGuinness Male and female choice in human sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 194–195.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004271G. Mitchell Sex differences and intent, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 195–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004283Mark Ridley Konrad Lorenz and Humpty Dumpty: some ethology for Donald Symons, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 196–196.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004295Michael Ruse Is science sexist?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 197–198.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004301Donald Stone Sade Human sexuality: hints for an alternative explanation, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 198–199.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004313H.D. Steklis Problems of comparative primate sexuality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 199–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004325Dorothy Tennov The clarification of proximate mechanisms, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 200–200.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004337J. Richard Udry Female sexual adaptability: a consequence of the absence of natural selection among females, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 201–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004350Shirley Weitz Sex differences in sexuality: what is their relevance to sex roles?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–202.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004362Richard E. Whalen Evolutionary causation: how proximate is ultimate?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 202–203.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004374Donald Symons The evolution of human sexuality revisited, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no.22 (Feb 2010): 203–214.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00004386