Abstract
Abstract Belief in the efficient markets hypothesis and the adoption of capital requirements for banks as the macro-prudential tool most compatible with market forces replaced the Federal Reserve’s (Fed) earlier commitment to using the link between open market operations and changes in reserve requirements to curb credit. Since severing that lever of influence over the credit supply, the central bank has relied on open market operations to achieve only one objective: to influence the demand for credit by changing the short-term policy rate. The unbalanced monetary toolkit contributed to a procyclical bias in policy outcomes that mirrored and exacerbated the evolving procyclical bias of the financial system. Failure to evaluate and strengthen its monetary tools has undermined the Fed’s ability to restore sustained economic growth and prevent another financial crisis.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Changes In Reserve Requirements
Open Market Operations
Procyclical Bias
Macro-prudential Tool
Monetary Tools
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Southern Economic Journal
Oct 1, 1976
Formation of Market Economy in Ukraine
Jan 28, 2020
International Finance Discussion Paper
Jan 1, 1987
Journal of finance and economics
Jul 1, 2019
Journal of Monetary Economics
Apr 1, 1995
Jan 1, 2016
Jan 1, 2016
Australian Journal of Management
Oct 1, 1979
SSRN Electronic Journal
Jan 1, 2010
Ola Financiera
Ola Financiera
Dec 7, 2020
Ola Financiera
Sep 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Sep 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Sep 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Sep 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Sep 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Jun 4, 2020
Ola Financiera
Apr 9, 2020
Ola Financiera
Apr 6, 2020