Abstract
British Educational Research JournalVolume 45, Issue 4 p. 898-898 ErratumFree Access Erratum This article corrects the following: Measuring conceptual understanding in randomised controlled trials: Can comparative judgement help? Ian Jones, Marie Bisson, Camilla Gilmore, Matthew Inglis, Volume 45Issue 3British Educational Research Journal pages: 662-680 First Published online: June 1, 2019 First published: 01 August 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3567AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat In the following article [1], the name of ethics committee under ‘Ethics and access’ on page 666 should have been corrected. The sentence reads: Approval was obtained from ANONYMISED ETHICS COMMITTEE prior to conducting the research. The sentence should read: Approval was obtained from Loughborough University's Ethics Approvals (Human Participants) Sub-Committee prior to conducting the research. Reference Jones, I., Bisson, M., Gilmore, C. & Inglis, M. (2019) Measuring conceptual understanding in randomised controlled trials: Can comparative judgement help?, British Educational Research Journal, 45, 662– 680. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3519. Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Volume45, Issue4August 2019Pages 898-898 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
