Abstract

Post-Marxist discourse theory, initially developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, has become a central node of contemporary critical theory. This essay explores how, in their attack against orthodox Marxism, Laclau and Mouffe self-consciously expelled political economy from the vast array of post-Marxism’s theoretical influences. While attempts have been offered to theorize capitalism while respecting discourse theory’s ontological postulates, most post-Marxist analyses, Laclau’s included, suffer from an insufficient account of institutions. Consequently, the complex cartography of political interactions these analyses provide is affected by the post-Marxists’ conceptual incapacity to grasp the strictly capitalist specificity of the societies they refer to. To substantiate this claim, three areas of Laclau’s work are scrutinized: the consequences derived from positing social demands as the primary unit of analysis; the effects of uniformly treating “class” as just one mode of political identification; and the understanding that results from theorizing temporal dynamics under capitalism in this particular way.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.