Abstract
This essay deals with the role of epistemic injustice in pointing out stereotypes in legal reasoning. The Author discusses the proposal of Janaina Matida and Alessia Farano to expand the concept of witness injustice and concludes with a proposal for an even broader version of the concept.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
