Abstract

Abstract Objectives Assess MDCT accuracy in staging cancers periampullary cancers. Introduction Periampullary malignancies are highly aggressive with poor outcomes. Surgery is the only curative option. It is crucial to define the patients who can advantage from a Whipple’s resection and who can avoid. Methodology and Results RCT investigated randomly 28 patients over 15 months. The patients were sub-divided into 2 groups. Group A, we relied mainly on the MDCT for preoperative staging, while in Group B staging laparoscopy was added before the abdominal exploration. Sensitivity of the MDCT and its accuracy were 100% in defining the signs of irresectability. For borderline staging, the accuracy of the scan was 62.5% and 71%, in groups A and B. The Overall accuracy of MDCT was 75%. It decreased to 68.1% for borderline lesions. The addition of staging laparoscopy to the diagnostic work up, increased the accuracy to 92.5%. The camera test was able to see occult findings which were missed in the images. liver Mets and malignant peritoneal fluid were localized in 18% and 9% respectively. 3 cases in group A and one in group B underwent unnecessary laparotomy. Thus, the false negative incidences were 21% and 7% in group A and B, with overall incidence 14.2%. Conclusion MDCT is highly sensitive and specific with high stage periampullary cancers. These parameters drop in border tumors with reduced accuracy in detecting the degree of vascular abutment and distant-occult findings. Addition of other adjuncts to decrease the rate of un-indicated laparotomy is advised.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call