Abstract

One of the most important territorial processes in the highly urbanised continent of Europe is suburbanisation, urban sprawl which occurs in a gradual manner over long periods and is not perceived as dramatic. Nevertheless the built-up urban areas and the urban lifestyle occupy step by step the periurban territories. Urban sprawl affects the essential environmental, economic and social functions of the impacted settlements. In the last decades these processes reached the less urbanised Central European region, leading to very fast and less planned changes in its settlement system. The research deals with these processes in the Central European non-metropolitan areas, around regional centres, and with their environmental impacts. The aim of this paper is, based on theoretical and empirical knowledge, to point out to spatial patterns of urban sprawl and suburbanisation in functional urban areas (FUA). This paper examines the urban sprawl and its impacts in Slovakia in the case of Nitra Functional Urban Area, in the agglomeration of an economically growing regional centre. The research is based on standard geographical methods including field research. Desktop and field empirical researches were conducted, with different methods such us GIS analysis of land use change. The analysis shows then to what extent cities and urban areas grow, from which one can conclude to how landscape surrounding the urban residential areas has changed, how the proportion of non-permeable surfaces increased, basically influencing the runoff of precipitation. The data demonstrate, moreover, how artificial patches and barriers fragment landscape more and more, endangering thereby biodiversity and decreasing green surfaces. The examination covers the 2000-2018 period, using the CORINE CLC 2000, 2006, 2012 and 2018 databases. Thereby the authors are able to examine changes in a longer period of almost two decades, and three internal periods. All this is compared to the demographic changes of the urban area of Nitra as well, in order to see to what extent the change in the number of population contributes to the transformation of land cover and thereby to environmental impacts. The characteristic features of Nitra and its hinterland within this are analysed, then the Nitra FUA and within that the suburban zone is examined in detail. Nitra and its area feature high enlargement dynamics looking at the whole of the period, compared to other FUAs. It is typical almost everywhere that the enlargement of areas surrounding cities is more intensive than the growth of the city itself, which demonstrates general suburbanisation.

Highlights

  • One of the important features of the urban development and urbanisation processes is that the space of the city, the areas used as urban space are growing, spreading and this process is changing the use of areas and landscape, which were previously in rural and close-to natural condition (EEA report, 2006, 2016; Enyedi, 2012; Ilbery, 1999; Kovács, 2014; Sturm & Cohen, 2004; Van den Berg, 1982).The growth of the population of cities and urban regions is fast in Europe, and the demand for space by new residential places and other functions is very rapidly increasing

  • The authors’ examination covers the 2000-2018 period, using the CORINE Corine Land Cover (CLC) 2000, 2006, 2012 and 2018 databases. Thereby they are able to examine changes in a longer period of almost two decades, and three internal periods. All this is compared to the demographic changes of the urban area of Nitra as well, in order to see to what extent the change in the number of population contributes to the transformation of land cover and thereby to environmental impacts

  • In 2000, 25,861.4 hectares from the territory of Slovakia were covered by artificial surface types (i.e. 5.3% of the territory of the country), which grew to 28,850.6 hectares (i.e. 5.9% of the territory of the country) by 2018, which is a growth of 11.6% in 18 years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The growth of the population of cities and urban regions is fast in Europe, and the demand for space by new residential places and other functions is very rapidly increasing. We can refer to the Marshall’s equation, according to which a 3% population increase will determine a 9% increase in area used by urban functions (Gardi, 2017). On the basis of this, the environmental impacts are the following: loss of environmentally fragile lands; reduced regional open space; greater air pollution; higher energy consumption; decreased aesthetic appeal of landscape; loss of farmland; reduced diversity of species; increased runoff of stormwater; increased risk of flooding; excessive removal of native vegetation; monotonous (and regionally inappropriate) residential visual environment; absence of mountain views; presence of ecologically wasteful golf courses; ecosystem fragmentation

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call