Abstract
Abstract Various runs were performed with a large eddy simulation (LES) model to evaluate different types of entrainment parametrizations. For this evaluation, three types of boundary layers were simulated: a clear convective boundary layer (CBL), a boundary layer containing a smoke concentration, and a cloud-topped boundary layer. It is shown that the assumption that the entrainment flux equals the product of the entrainment rate and the jump over a discontinuous inversion is not valid in CBLs simulated by an LES model. A finite inversion thickness (i.e., a first-order jump model) is needed to define an entrainment flux for which this approximation of the flux is valid. This entrainment flux includes not only the buoyancy flux at the inversion, but also the surface heat flux. The parameterization of the buoyancy flux at the inversion is evaluated for different closures, as suggested in the literature (i.e., Eulerian partitioning, process partitioning, and a closure developed by Deardorff), and where need...
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call