Abstract
The paper focuses on the differences in interpretation of the institutional theory main terms – «social institution» and «social institute» in Ukrainian and world sociology language. In accordance with the requirements of the sociological methodology (systemic understanding of all social phenomena) and the etymology of these terms, social institutions are treated as balanced systems of component institutes. It is stressed that electronic democracy is a relatively autonomous institute, which is a part of democracy institution structure. In line with this approach, the institute of e-democracy is considered as an integral part of the social institution of democracy, which arises in the modernization process of the institution, its adaptation to the requirements of modern computerized society, and performs certain functions in it, partial tasks in the system of public appointment of the institution of democracy as a whole. E-democracy formation serves not only as a formal sign of the institutional modification, but at the same time it is a qualitative change, a significant transformation of the essential filling of institution. This contributes to the more effective achievement of democracy main purpose: the expansion of citizen participation in the power decisions adoption, and thus stimulate the formation of civil society in modern conditions. At the same time, electronic democracy in Ukraine, which is at an early stage of institutional development, is rather vulnerable, and thus generates a many problems and threats for the institution of democracy and modern society as a whole. They relate primarily to the inadequate accessibility of this tool for the citizens (the socio-cultural dimension of the problem), the complication with effective protection of information dissemination channels (the technical side of the problem), and the counteraction to the consequences of unauthorized interference with the course and direction of democratic procedures (the socio-technical dimension of the problem), and therefore require a proper response from society for these threats.
Highlights
У статті акцентується увага на розходженнях при трактуванні основних термінів інституційної теорії – «соціальна інституція / social institution» та «соціальний інститут/social institute» у мові української та світової соціології
The paper focuses on the differences in interpretation of the institutional theory main terms – «social institution» and «social institute» in Ukrainian and world sociology language
It is stressed that electronic democracy is a relatively autonomous institute, which is a part of democracy institution structure
Summary
У статті акцентується увага на розходженнях при трактуванні основних термінів інституційної теорії – «соціальна інституція / social institution» та «соціальний інститут/social institute» у мові української та світової соціології. Водночас електронна демократія в Україні, перебуваючи на ранній стадії інституційного розвитку, є достатньо уразливою, а отже, породжує низку проблем та загроз для самої інституції демократії та сучасного суспільства в цілому.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
