Abstract

We investigate the use of an inexact Newton's method to solve the potential equations in the transonic regime. As a test case, we solve the two-dimensional steady transonic small disturbance equation. Approximate factorization/ADI techniques have traditionally been employed for implicit solutions of this nonlinear equation. Instead, we apply Newton's method using an exact analytical determination of the Jacobian with preconditioned conjugate gradient-like iterative solvers for solution of the linear systems in each Newton iteration. Two iterative solvers are tested; a block s-step version of the classical Orthomin(k) algorithm called orthogonal s-step Orthomin (OSOmin) and the well-known GMRES method. The preconditioner is a vectorizable and parallelizable version of incomplete LU (ILU) factorization. Efficiency of the Newton–Iterative method on vector and parallel computer architectures is the main issue addressed. In vectorized tests on a single processor of the Cray C-90, the performance of Newton–OSOmin is superior to Newton–GMRES and a more traditional monotone AF/ADI method (MAF) for a variety of transonic Mach numbers and mesh sizes. Newton–GMRES is superior to MAF for some cases. The parallel performance of the Newton method is also found to be very good on multiple processors of the Cray C-90 and on the massively parallel thinking machine CM-5, where very fast execution rates (up to 9 Gflops) are found for large problems.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.