Abstract
The article presents the results of studies of the effect of commercial disinfectants registered in Ukraine and allowed for use in beekeeping, as well as a comparative characteristic of their effectiveness in the disinfection of wooden beehive structures. The research was conducted on the basis of the departments of hygiene, sanitation and general veterinary prevention and technology of production and processing of products of small animals of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z. Gzhytskyi and SLW “Biolab” Food and Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (Ostroda, Poland). For research in the spring and summer period 4 groups of test objects were formed on the principle of analogues. Distilled water was used to control disinfection (test group 1). In the second experimental group for disinfection used “Brovadez-20” (active substance benzalkonium chloride 0.5%), in the third experimental group гру “Vetox-1000” (active substance hypochlorite 0.3%) and in the fourth experimental group – “Sumerian silver”(active ingredient of 10% citrate of Argentum citrate). In a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the disinfectants of the II, III and IV groups, the growth of gram-positive (Streptomyces badius, Curtobakterium) and gram-negative bacteria (Xanthomonas hyacinthi, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Acidovorax defluvii) was detected, respectively, among the endophores. In the current literature, information on the threat to the health of the honey bee detected by microorganisms is missing. According to the research, certain differences between the effectiveness of disinfectants have been established. It was found that the total microbial number (BMI) was 0.15% in group II, 0.16% in group III and up to 0.10% in group IV relative to control. It was found that the Sumer silver disinfectant at 10% concentration provides the best bactericidal effect (P < 0.001). In a comparative intergroup analysis of the effectiveness of disinfectants, it was found that in the conditions of the experiment, the level of bactericidal activity was the highest in the experiment with the SMC in the case of the use of “Sumer silver” was 32.3% and 34.4% better compared to “Brovades-20” and “Vetox-1000”, respectively. The use of “Sumerian silver” allows you to get the desired result 10 and 4 times faster than the disinfectants “Brovadez-20” and “Vetox-1000” respectively.
Highlights
The article presents the results of studies of the effect of commercial disinfectants registered in Ukraine and allowed for use in beekeeping, as well as a comparative characteristic of their effectiveness in the disinfection of wooden beehive structures
The research was conducted on the basis of the departments of hygiene, sanitation and general veterinary prevention and technology of production and processing of products of small animals of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S.Z
For research in the spring and summer period 4 groups of test objects were formed on the principle of analogues
Summary
Leshchyshyn, M.V., Dvylyuk, I.V., & Rykniuk, M.M. (2019). Efficiency of application of modern sanitation supplies in beekeeping. In a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the disinfectants of the II, III and IV groups, the growth of gram-positive (Streptomyces badius, Curtobakterium) and gram-negative bacteria (Xanthomonas hyacinthi, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Acidovorax defluvii) was detected, respectively, among the endophores. За порівняльного аналізу ефективності дезінфікуючих засобів ІІ, ІІІ і ІV груп було виявлено ріст грампозитивних (Streptomyces badius, Curtobakterium) та грамнегативних бактерій (Xanthomonas hyacinthi, Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Acidovorax defluvii) відповідно серед спороутворючих мікрооганізмів було виявлено (Bac. endophyticus). За порівняльного міжгрупового аналізу ефективності дезінфікуючих засобів встановлено, що в умовах експерименту за рівнем ЗМЧ найвищий рівень бактерицидної активності був виражений у випадку застосування “Шумерського срібла” був кращим на 32,3% та 34,4% відносно до “Бровадезу-20” та “Ветоксу-1000” відповідно. Серед зареєстрованих на ринку України та дозволених для застосування у бджільництві дезінфікуючих засобів є лише препарати на основі безалконію хлориду, натрію гіпохлориту та наноформи цитрату Купруму і Аргентуму. Метою наших досліджень було провести санітарно-гігієнічну оцінку засобів, які використовуються у бджільництві щодо мікрофлори внутрішньої частини дерев’яних вуликів
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.